Stop Taxing Our Deployments: The Real Cost of Africa's New Tech Rules
Policymakers across Ghana and Kenya are tightening the screws on foreign capital. But they don't realize they are actually making it harder for local developers to keep their servers running.
My AWS bill hit this morning, and while I was staring at the dashboard wondering if I should migrate some microservices to a cheaper VPS, a buddy of mine from Accra called. He sounded like someone whose staging environment had just crashed right before a major demo.
He’s building a SaaS tool for logistics, and suddenly he’s looking at draft laws in Ghana that say his cloud hosting or SaaS startup might need to be "wholly owned by a citizen" to get licensed.
It made me shut my terminal and just think. We are constantly told to build world-class products, but the moment we start getting traction and attracting the capital needed to scale, the goalposts get shifted.
The Myth of "Protecting Local Tech"
In Ghana, they are trying to pass this National Information Technology Authority bill. Section 37 basically wants to reserve cloud hosting, SaaS, and data centers for entities wholly owned by citizens. The politicians say they want to "proactively protect Ghanaian technology firms."
But let’s talk about how we actually build things.
If you are a developer in a Gbagada workstation or a small hub in Akure, you aren't building your own data center from scratch. You are using AWS, GCP, Supabase, or Twilio. You need foreign APIs, foreign infrastructure, and eventually, foreign capital to pay for those dollar-denominated services.
If you tell a foreign investor that they can’t own a piece of the SaaS company they are funding because of a "citizen-only" rule, they won't magically walk away and let local banks fund us. (We all know local banks would rather lend to oil importers than a software dev anyway). They will just take their money to another continent, and our local startups will starve.
The Tax Trap for Holding Companies
Meanwhile, Kenya is doing its own thing with the Finance Bill 2026. They want a 15% capital gains tax on offshore sales where the shares "derive their value from Kenya."
For anyone who hasn't had to set up a startup entity structure, here is why this is a nightmare. Most African startups use holding companies—usually in Delaware, London, or Mauritius—because local business registries are slow, and foreign investors refuse to send dollars directly into local bank accounts.
If you do a simple internal reorganization, clean up your cap table, or move shares around to prepare for a new funding round, Kenya's new draft law could slap you with a massive tax bill. This isn't catching massive tax-evading multinationals; it is punishing founders who are just trying to keep their equity clean. We are already battling "Sapa" and crazy inflation; the last thing we need is to spend our limited runway on international tax lawyers just to restructure our codebases and companies.
We Just Want to Build
We think we have it rough in Nigeria with the FX swings and power grid collapses, but looking at our neighbors makes me realize the entire continent's tech ecosystem is dealing with regulatory whack-a-mole.
If governments want to build local capacity, they shouldn't do it by putting digital fences around our borders. They should do it by making it easy to build.
Make sure a developer in a cold morning in Jos has constant electricity. Make sure a founder in Owerri can receive international payments without jumping through ten hoops. Don't write laws that treat software startups like they are oil wells that can be taxed and restricted at every turn.
We will keep pushing anyway because "no gree for anybody" is how we survive. But honestly, I wish the people drafting these bills would actually try to deploy a simple React app and pay for a database before they decide to regulate how we run our businesses.
Related from Venture
Let's build your next big product.
Accepting project-based freelance, remote engineering roles, and hybrid positions.